Comments on: Word Jumbling ‘Experiment’

By: Mark Worthington

Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:15:54 +0000

Excellent! Thanks for making this little script available!

Mark

]]>

By: Davy

Sun, 08 Feb 2009 03:13:35 +0000

This is partially accurate: word phonemes are interpreted as you describe, but words made of more than one phoneme are not. An example from your text is “wihouut” (without) which is interpreted incorrectly unless thought of as two, e.g. “wtih uot” (with out).

]]>

By: Addy

Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:08:20 +0000

Ran into this via StumbleUpon – very interesting, especially as lately I realized my emails would probably look just like that without Gmail spell checker… I think computers will eventfully make us all dyslexic.

Anyway, perhaps you can add this as a Gmail plug-in? Looks like lots of fun!

P.S: It also works in Hebrew.

Addy

]]>

By: sfanetti

Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:09:27 +0000

Dude this is a pertty cool dtaetooisnrmn of hmaun poirtecepn and pettran mtcniahg. I fnid it fcaasniintg taht the brian deos not raelly need to regncisoe ervey crhaaetcr to be albe to read a wrod. I susppoe it uess the spheas of the wdros and the lerttes — whngteiig pbilsose ienoatpterrtnis bsead on eacsh pseonr’s einprxeece. Too cool

]]>

By: Shane

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:52:46 +0000

Vrey istintnreeg Jmaes.

^
A predictable comment, but the truth nonetheless.

]]>

By: Usman Bashir

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:13:02 +0000

I have read about it before and it is a very interesting phenomenon that we are still able to read on even though the words are broken.

It will be a fun plugin if developed for jQuery, just call a function of this plugin on an element and that’s it.

]]>

By: Steven Black

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:05:39 +0000

Rghit you are abuot rdnaom eeraovnuds, Jmeas.

Now if only bswerros cloud dael wtih jmelbud jvarascpit.

]]>